UDK 330.131.7
CONCEPTIONAL APPROACH AND MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUE TO MANAGE RISKS OF INNOVATIONS IN THE SPACE INDUSTRY
P. O. Mikhin, A. N. Antamoshkin, E. A. Antamoshkina*
Reshetnev Siberian State Aerospace University 31, Krasnoyarsky Rabochy Av., Krasnoyarsk, 660037, Russian Federation *E-mail: oleslav@mail.ru
Innovation growth in the Russian Federation is accompanied by the high level of risks. A significant number of the world rankings which do not suppose Russia to be a leader confirms this fact. It is necessary to take into account risks that each process includes dealing with innovations in the space industry due to the rapid growth of the negative conse-quences of violations in the “normal” functioning of economic processes. Building up the risk management of innova-tions in the space industry should be implemented based on the need to solve the following problems: to set up a unified regulatory framework, to have an ability to predict the results, to organize clear and timely communication, qualifica-tion and training of plant staff. To solve these problems there is a provided conceptual approach of risk management of innovations in the space industry. The conceptual approach is formed on the basis of the goals set by the company in the field of risk innovation management. Implementation of the conceptual approach involves adherence to certain principles at work. As a part of the approach it is supposed to manage risks through their identification, formation of risk management strategies, process optimization based on a strategy of innovation risk management. Optimization of the process should be carried out using the introduced method of innovation risk management in the space industry. The technique includes an analysis of the processes that are vulnerable to innovation risks using tensor method of risk analysis.
Keywords: Innovative risks, space industry enterprises, Gabriel Kron tensor method, conceptional approach and management technique to manage risks.
References

References

 

1.  Gracheva M. V. [et al.]. Analiz i upravlenie riskami innovatsionnoi deyatel’nosti [Risk analysis and management of innovation]. Moscow, YuNITI-DANA Publ., 2006, 351 p.

2.  Nal’giev A. K. S. Razvitie protsessnogo upravleniya. [Process management development]. Moscow, MAKS Press Publ., 2004, 22 p.

3.  Oikhman E. G., Popov E. V. Reinzhiniring biznesa: Reinzhiniring organizatsii i informatsionnye tekhnologii. [Reengineering Business: Reengineering organizations and information technology]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 1997, 336 p.

4.  Rapoport B. M., Skubchenko A. I. Inzhiniring i modelirovanie biznesa. [Engineering and Business Modeling]. Moscow, Tandem, Ekmos Publ., 2001, 240 p.

5.  Balabanov I. G. Risk-menedzhment. [Risk Management]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 1996, 196 p.

6.  Ryzhikova O. N. [Risk Management of innovative projects]. Audit i fin. analiz. 2009, No. 1. 368–371 p. (In Russ.).

7.  Kochetov A. G., Novatsionnye biznes-protsessy. Poshagovaya tekhnologiya razrabotki, vnedreniya i kontrolya vypolneniya. [Novation business processes. Turn-based technology development, implementation and monitoring of the implementation]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2009, 144 p.

8.  Mikhalev G. S. Teoreticheskii analiz v nauchnykh ekonomicheskikh issledovaniyakh: analiz osnovopolagayushchikh ponyatii: [Theoretical analysis of scientific economic research: the analysis of the fundamental concepts]. Krasnoyarsk, SAA Publ., 2000, 60 p.

9.  Barton T., Shenker U., Uoker P. Kompleksnyi podkhod k risk-menedzhmentu: stoit li etim zanimat’sya: Per. s angl. [A comprehensive approach to risk management: is it worth doing it: Translated from English]. Moscow, Vil’yams Publ., 2003, 208 p.

10.  Chernova G. V., Kudryavtsev A. A. Upravlenie riskami [Risk management]. Moscow, TK Velbi, Prospekt Publ., 2005, 160 p.

11.  Glushchenko V. Riski innovatsionnoi i investitsionnoi deyatel’nosti v usloviyakh globalizatsii. [Risks of innovation and investment in the globalization context]. Zheleznodorozhnyi, Kryl’ya Publ., 2006, 232 p.

12.  Kron G. Issledovanie slozhnykh sistem po chastyam diakoptika. [Investigation of complex systems in parts – diacoptics]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1972, 542 p.

13.  Verevkina E. V., Levin D. N., Petrov M. N. Tenzornaya metodologiya issledovaniya nadezhnosti biznes-protsessov [Tensor research methodology of reliability of business processes]. Krasnoyarsk, NII SUVPT Publ., 2006. 135 p.

14.  Verevkina E. V., Levin D. N., Petrov M. N. Tenzornaya metodologiya issledovaniya nadezhnosti byuiznes-protsessov. [Tensor research methodology reliability business processes]. Krasnoyarsk, NII SUVPT Publ., 2006, 135 p.

15.    Cheremnykh S. V. et al. Strukturnyi analiz sistem. IDEF-tekhnologii. [Structural analysis systems. IDEF-technology]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 2001, 208 p.


Mikhin Petr Olegovich – postgraduate, Reshetnev Siberian State Aerospace University. E-mail: mkhnptr@gmail.com.

Antamoshkin Aleksandr Nikolaevich – Dr. Sc., professor, Reshetnev Siberian State Aerospace University. E-mail: oleslav@mail.ru.

Antamoshkina Elena Aleksandrovna – Cand. Sc., Docent, Reshetnev Siberian State Aerospace University. E-mail: e-lena-ant@mail.ru.