UDK 621
TO THE QUESTION ABOUT THE STATES OF WORKABILITY FOR AUTOMATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS WITH COMPLICATED STRUCTURE
P. A. Kuznetsov1*, D. I. Kovalev2, V. V. Losev1, A. O. Kalinin1
1Siberian State Technological University 82, Mira Av., Krasnoyarsk, 660049, Russian Federation 2Reshetnev Siberian State Aerospace University 31, Krasnoyarsky Rabochy Av., Krasnoyarsk, 660037, Russian Federation *E-mail: forubox@yandex.ru
The article discusses the reliability of automated control systems. The approach to the classification systems for health States is analyzed. This approach can be traditional binary approach, operating with the concept of “serviceability”, and other variants of estimation of the system state. This article provides such option, providing selective evaluation of components for the reliability of the entire system. The description of various automatic control systems and their elements from the point of view of health and risk, mathematical method of determining the transition object from state to state, their difference from each other in the implementation of the objective function are introduced. The interplay of elements in different States, the aggregate state of the elements connected in series or in parallel is explored. There are the tables of various logic States and the principles of their calculation in series and parallel connection. Through simulation the proposed approach is illustrated by finding the probability of getting into the system state data in parallel and serially connected elements, with their different probabilities of moving from state to state. In general, the materials of article will be useful for analyzing of the reliability of the automated control systems and engineering of the highly-reliable systems. Thus, this mechanism determined the State of the system provides more detailed information about it and allows a selective approach to the reliability of the system as a whole. Detailed results when assessing the reliability of the automated control systems allow the engineer to make an informed decision when designing means of improving reliability.
Keywords: reliability, states, faultlessness, workability.
References

References

 

  1. Kurochkin Yu. A., Smirnov A. S., Stepanov V. A. Nadezhnost’ i diagnostirovanie tsifrovykh ustroystv i sistem [Reliability and diagnostics of digital systems]. St. Petersburg. St. Petersburg University Publ., 1993, 320 p.
  2. Aleksandrovskaya L. N., Aronov I. Z., Kruglov V. I., Kuznetsov A. G., Patrakov N. N., Sholom A. M. Bezopasnost’ i nadezhnost’ tekhnicheskikh sistem. [Safety and reliability of technical systems.]. Moscow, Logos Publ. 2004, 280 p.
  3. Sugak E. V, Vasilenko N. V. Nadezhnost’ tekhnicheskikh sistem. [Reliability of technical systems]. Krasnoyarsk, NII SUVPT Publ., 2000, 608 p.
  4. Losev V. V. [Reliability analysis of ACS]. Vestnik universitetskogo kompleksa: Sb. nauchn. tr. 2008, Vol. 11(25), P. 16–19 (In Russ.).
  5. Kovalev I. V., Kuznetsov P. A., Zelenkov P. V., Shaydurov V. V., Bakhmareva K. K. [To the question of the reliability of automated control systems with blocking protection modules]. Pribory. 2013, Vol. 6, P. 20–24 (In Russ.).
  6. Ryabinin I. A. Nadezhnost’ i bezopasnost’ strukturno-slozhnykh sistem [Reliability and safety of structural complex systems]. St. Petersburg. St. Petersburg University Publ., 2007, 276 p.
  7. Fedorov Yu. N. Spravochnik inzhenera po ASU TP: Proektirovanie i razrabotka. [PCS engineer reference: Design and development] Moscow, Infra-inzheneriya Publ., 2015, 929 p.
  8. GOST 27.002–89 Nadezhnost’ v tekhnike. Osnovnye ponyatiya. Terminy i opredeleniya [State Standard 27.002-89. Reliability in the technology. Basic concepts. Terms and Definitions]. Available at: http://vsegost.com/Catalog/11/11290.shtml (accessed 12.02.2015).
  9. Kuznetsov P. A. [On the analysis of the effectiveness of fully redundant systems]. Vestnik SibGAU, 2015, Vol. 16, No. 2, P. 326–331 (In Russ.).
  10. Kuznetsov P. A., Beschastnaya N. A., Bakhmareva K. K., Antamoshkin O. A., Antamoshkin A. N. [ Modification of Volkovich and Michalevi`s method to optimize costs in the synthesis of fault-tolerant information systems]. Vestnik SibGAU. 2012, No. 6(46), P. 97–100 (In Russ.).
  11. Kuznetsov P. A. [Dependant failures in multifunctional ACS]. Vestnik SibGAU. 2015, Vol. 16, No. 1, P. 86–91 (In Russ.).
  12. Petrokas L. V. Teoriya mashin-avtomatov i pnevmogidroprivodov [Theory of automated machines and pneumatic drives] Moscow, Mashinostroenie Publ., 1970, 334 p.
  13. Slovar’ po kibernetike [Cybernetics dictionary]. Ed. V. S. Mikhalevich. Kiev, Glav. red. Ukr. Sov. Entsiklopedii im. M. P. Bazhana Publ., 1989, 751 p.
  14. Akopov A. Imitatsionnoe modelirovanie [Simulation]. M. : Jurayt Publ., 2015, 390 p.
  15. Pan’gina N. N., Pan’gin A. A. [Statistical modeling. Monte-Carlo method]. Komp’yuternye instrumenty v obrazovanii. 2002, No. 5, P. 30–43 (In Russ.).

 


Kuznetsov Petr Anatol’evich – assistant of Automation technological processes department, Siberian State Technological University. Е-mail: forubox@yandex.ru.

Kovalev Dmitry Igorevich – Master’s Degree student, Reshetnev Siberian State Aerospace University. Е-mail: kovalev.fsu@mail.ru.

Losev Vasiliy Vladimirovich – Cand. Sc., Docent of Automation technological processes department, Siberian State Technological University. Е-mail: basilos@mail.ru.

Kalinin Andrey Olegovich – postgraduate student, Automation technological processes department, Siberian State Technological University. Е-mail: mpx_@mail.ru.