621.455
Doi: 10.31772/2712-8970-2021-22-3-480-493
Аpplication of the propulsion subsystem on the base of SPT-100V plasmic thruster to orbit raising and orbit control of the Express-80 and Express-103 spacecraft
Ermoshkin Yu. M., Vnukov A. A., Volkov D. V., Kochev Yu. V., Simanov R. S., Yakimov E. N., Grikhin G. S.
JSC Academician M. F. Reshetnev Information Satellite Systems,
52, Lenin St., Zheleznogorsk, Krasnoyarsk region, 662972, Russian Federation;
JSC Experimental Design Bureau,
181, Moskovsky prosp. Kaliningrad, 236001, Russian Federation
Recently, there has been an increase of interest in satellite orbit raising using electric propulsion subsys-tems. Theoretic analyses and practical experience demonstrate that while orbit raising to the geostationary orbit (GEO) via a transfer orbit is feasible, it requires a certain amount of time due to the thrust of onboard electric thrusters being low (40-300 mN) and thus incomparable with that of propulsion systems of liquid propellant thrusters (22-400 N). Due to low thrust, orbit raising by electric thrusters is time-consuming. However, the associated increase in mass to GEO may counterbalance the long duration of satellite commis-sioning. Calculations demonstrate a potential added satellite mass on GEO of up to several hundred kilo-grams with orbit raising duration of about 6 months. In particular, with satellite mass not exceeding 2500 kg, coupled launch is possible using existing launch vehicles. ISS took into consideration the positive results ob-tained with Express-AM5, and Express-AM6 satellites to design the Express-80 and Express-103 with orbit raising in mind. Such approach allowed for a coupled launch on the Proton-M carrier rocked with a Breeze-M upper stage, and a twofold launch cost saving. To increase thrust during orbit raising and decrease its du-ration, coupled thruster operation in high thrust mode was implemented. The resulting total mass on GEO increase constituted over 700 kilograms with maneuver duration of up to 158 days. This allows performing coupled launches of heavier satellites with orbit raising by means of electric propulsion in a feasible time-frame.
Keywords: plasmic thruster, spacecraft, orbit raising, power processing unit, orbit control.
1.Casaregola
C. Electric Propulsion for Station Keeping and Electric Orbit Raising on
Eutelsat Platform. Joint Conference of 30th
ISTS, 34th IEPC, 6th NSAT, Kobe-Hyogo, Japan, July
4–10, 2015, IEPC-2015-97, 6 p.
2.Yakovlev
A. V., Vnukov A. A., Balandina et al. [Injection of a
spacecraft into a geostationary orbit by a combined method]. Vestnik SibGU. 2016, Vol. 17, No. 3, P.
782–789 (In Russ.).
3.Hoskins
W. A., Cassady R. J., Myers R. et al. 30 Years of Electric Propulsion Flight
Experience at Aerojet Rocketdyne. 33st
International Electric Conference, The George Washington University, USA,
October 6–10, 2013, IEPC-2013-439, 12 p.
4.Testoedov
N. A., Makridenko L. A., Sevast’yanov N. N. et al. Overview of Electric
Propulsion activity in Russia. 30th
International Electric Conference, Florence, Italy, Sept. 17–20, 2007,
IEPC-2007-275, 16 p.
5.Konstantinov
M. The analysis of electric propulsion characteristics on efficiency of
transport maneuvers. 30th
International Electric Propulsion Conference, Florence, Italy, Sept. 17–20,
2007, IEPC-2007-212, 18 p.
6.Obukhov
V. A., Petukhov V. G., Popov G. A. Application of Stationary Plasma Thrusters
for Spacecraft Insertion into the Geostationary Orbit. Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress, IAC. Series
“63rd International Astronautical Congress 2012, IAC 2012”
2012. P. 7569–7577.
7.J.
Gonzalez del Amo. European Space Agency Activities in Electric Propulsion. 33st International Electric Conference,
The George Washington University, USA, October 6–10, 2013, IEPC-2013-37, 9 p.
8.Ermoshkin
Yu. M., Volkov D. V., Yakimov E. N. On the concept of
“all-electric spacecraft”. Siberian
Journal of Science and Technology. 2018. Vol. 19, No. 3, P. 489–496
(In Russ.).
9.Trescott
J. A., Horton J. F., Rapoport S.The Benefits of Continued Advances in the
Propulsive Capability of the Electric GEO Communications Satellite. The 36th International Electric
Propulsioin Conference, University of Vienna, Austria, Sept. 15–20, 2019,
IEPC-2019-212, 10 p.
10.Krasil’nikov
A. [Powerful telecommunication Express-AM5]. Novosti kosmonavtiki. 2014,
No. 2, P. 38–41 (In Russ.).
11.Krasil’nikov
A. [The hard way of Express-AM6]. Novosti kosmonavtiki. 2014, No. 12, P.
42–45 (In Russ.).
12.Rueda
P., Schneider A. Electra – a Flexible Full Electric Propulsion Platform for GEO
Missions. Aerospace Europe Bulletin,
July 2019, P. 21–23.
13.Bourguignon E., Fraselle S. Power Processing
Unit Activities at Thales Alenia Space in Belgium. The 36th International Electric Propulsioin Conference,
University of Vienna, Austria, Sept. 15–20, 2019, IEPC-2019-584, 8 p.
14.Zapusk kosmicheskikh apparatov «Express-103»
i «Express-80» [Launch of the spacecraft “Express-103” and “Express-80”].
Available at: https://www.roscosmos.ru/28882/ (accessed
18.03.2021).
15.Doronkin
M. N., Babanov A. A., Vnukov A. A. et al. Sposob
vuvedeniya kosmicheskogo apparata na geostatsionarnuyu orbitu s ispol’zovaniem
dvigatelei maloi tyagi [Method of launching
a spacecraft into geostationary orbit using low-thrust engines]. Patent
RF, No. 2014127670/11, 2016.