Научная электронная библиотека ULRICH'S Periodicals Directory

Сибирский государственный университет
науки и технологий имени академика М.Ф. Решетнева

Сибирский аэрокосмический журнал
ISSN 2712-8970 (Print) ISSN 2782-5760 (on-line)

Сведения об образовательной организации

UDK 519.711.3 Doi: 10.31772/2587-6066-2020-21-2-176-186
MANAGING A GROUP OF OBJECTS AS A TASK OF SYSTEM ANALYSIS
M. E. Kornet, A. V. Medvedev, D. I. Yareshchenko
Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology; 31, Krasnoyarskii rabochii prospekt, Krasnoyarsk, 660037, Russian Federation Siberian Federal University; 26к1, Academician Kirensky St., Krasnoyarsk, 660074, Russian Federation
In this paper, we consider the general statement of the problem of identification and management of a group of objects. A group refers to several objects combined for the manufacture of a product. The main feature is that when managing such systems, it is necessary to change the setting actions for each object. This is due to the fact that today the technological regulations in many cases are wider than they should be for good operating. This is a consequence of the fact that the current production culture (this, in particular, has been shown by the experience of processing data from the technological process for the production of transis-tors at Svetlana) is rather low, which leads to some organizational problems. It is clear that it is necessary to have certain models of objects that naturally differ from each other and can be considered under conditions of both parametric and nonparametric uncertainty. Moreover, there may be cases when an object is considered simultaneously under conditions of both parametric and nonparametric uncertainty over various channels. Now, regarding the delay, due to the fact that the measurement of some variables is carried out in a significantly long-er time interval than the object constant, it is necessary to distinguish the time of measuring technological vari-ables and, in fact, the delay typical to the process itself, taking into account the difference between the channels. This leads to the fact that dynamic processes are essentially forced to be considered as inertialess with delay. Another significant feature is that the components of the output variables are stochastically dependent in ad-vance in an unknown manner. The use of correlation or dispersion relations in this case does not lead to success. A special analysis of T-processes and the ability to simulate such processes are required. In particular, this is one of the tasks of this article. It contains: T-processes, T-models and the corresponding heterogeneous control algorithms. The process of hydrodeparaffinization of diesel fuel is considered according to available data, which can be said a priori that they are incomplete, that is they do not reflect the complex behavior of the pro-cess. From here it follows that these data require replenishment, which today is not carried out for various rea-sons. Thus, the process of hydrodewaxing can be taken to the T-process. Modeling a multidimensional system based on real data has shown that in this problem the presetting effect for different objects should be different. The exception is only the setting actions for the entire complex or group of objects. Modeling was carried out on the basis of T-models considered in the article. It has already been not-ed that these models should not be taken as complete, giving an idea of reality. They will be subject to algorith-mic refinement during further research. The decision is made by the researcher. At this stage that an assessment is given that, under the circumstances, the resulting models and control algorithms can be adopted for use in a production environment. An attempt to use the existing theory of identification and control for the process of hydrodewaxing will inevitably lead to a significant degradation and increase in the cost of a computer system for operating the quality of this process.
Keywords: group of objects, identification, control, setting actions, nonparametric algorithms, T-process, multidimensional objects, adaptation.
References

1.  Medvedev A. V., Yareshchenko D. I. [On modeling the process of acquiring knowledge by students at a university]. Vysshee obrazovanie. 2017, No. 1, P. 7–10
(In Russ.).

2.  Yareshchenko D. I. [Some notes on the assessment of knowledge of university students]. Otkrytoe obrazovanie. 2017, No. 4, P. 66–72 (In Russ.).

3.  Agafonov E. D., Medvedev A. V., Orlovskaya N. F., Sinyuta V. R., Yareshchenko D. I. [Predictive model of the process of catalytic hydrodeparaffinization in the absence of a priori information]. Izv. Tul'skogo gos. un-ta. Tekhn. Nauki. 2018, No. 9, P. 456–468 (In Russ.).

4.  Korneeva A. A., Sergeeva N. A. [On nonparametric identification of inertialess objects with delay]. Inform. tekhnologii modelirovaniya i upr. 2012, No. 5,
P. 363–370 (In Russ.).

5.  Peregudov F. I., Tarasenko F. P. Vvedenie v sistemnyy analiz [Introduction to Systems Analysis]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1989, 367 p.

6.  Medvedev A. V. Osnovy teorii neparametricheskikh sistem. Identifikatsiya, upravlenie, prinyatie resheniy [Fundamentals of the theory of nonparametric systems. Identification, management, decision making]. Krasnoyarsk, SibGU im. M. F. Reshetneva Publ., 2018, 732 p.

7.  Tsypkin Ya. Z. Osnovy informatsionnoy teorii identifikatsii [Fundamentals of the information theory of identification]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1984, 320 p.

8.  Eykkhoff P. Osnovy identifikatsii sistem upravleniya [The basics of identifying control systems].
Moscow, Mir Publ., 1975, 680 p.

9.  Nadaraya E. A. Neparametricheskoe otsenivanie plotnosti veroyatnostey i krivoy regressii [Nonparametric estimation of probability density and regression curve]. Tbilisi, Izd-vo Tbilisskogo un-ta Publ., 1983, 194 p.

10. Medvedev A. V., Yareshchenko D. I. [Nonparametric modeling of T-processes in conditions of incomplete information]. Informatsionnye tekhnologii. 2019, No. 10, P. 579–584 (In Russ.).

11. Medvedev A. V. Informatizatsiya upravleniya [Management Informatization]. Krasnoyarsk, SAA Publ., 1995, 80 p.

12.     Tipovaya sistema upravleniya kachestvom [Typical Quality Management System]. Leningrad, Elektronstandart Publ., 1977, 237 p.

13. Medvedev A. V. [On the theory of nonparametric control systems]. Vestn. Tom. gos. un-ta. Upr., vychisl. tekhnika i informatika. 2013, No. 1, P. 6–19 (In Russ.).

14. Pupkov K. A., Egupov N. D. Metody klassicheskoy i sovremennoy teorii avtomaticheskogo upravleniya. T. 1: Matematicheskie modeli, dinamicheskie kharakteristiki i analiz sistem upravleniya [Methods of the classical
and modern theory of automatic control. Mathematical models, dynamic characteristics and analysis of control systems]. Moscow, MGTU im. N. E. Baumana Publ., 2004, 748 p.

15. Pupkov K. A., Egupov N. D. Metody klassicheskoy i sovremennoy teorii avtomaticheskogo upravleniya. T. 2: Statisticheskaya dinamika i identifikatsiya sistem avtomaticheskogo upravleniya  [Methods of the classical and modern theory of automatic control. Statistical dynamics and identification of automatic control systems]. Moscow, MGTU im. N. E. Baumana Publ., 2004, 640 p.

16.     Pupkov K. A., Egupov N. D. Metody klassicheskoy i sovremennoy teorii avtomaticheskogo upravleniya. T. 3: Sintez regulyatorov sistem avtomaticheskogo upravleniya  [Methods of the classical and modern theory of automatic control. Synthesis of automatic control system regulators]. Moscow, MGTU im. N. E. Baumana Publ., 2004, 748 p.

17.     Pupkov K. A., Egupov N. D. Metody klassicheskoy i sovremennoy teorii avtomaticheskogo upravleniya. T. 4: Teoriya optimizatsii sistem avtomaticheskogo upravleniya [Methods of the classical and modern theory of automatic control. Theory of optimization of automatic control systems]. Moscow, MGTU im. N. E. Baumana Publ., 2004, 748 p.

18.     Pupkov K. A., Egupov N. D. Metody klassicheskoy i sovremennoy teorii avtomaticheskogo upravleniya. T. 5: Metody sovremennoy teorii avtomaticheskogo upravleniya [Methods of the classical and modern theory of automatic control. Methods of the modern theory of automatic control]. Moscow, MGTU im.
N. E. Baumana Publ., 2004, 742 p.

19. Faleev S. A., Belinskaya N. S., Ivanchina E. D. [Optimization of the hydrocarbon composition of raw materials in reforming and hydrodewaxing plants using mathematical modeling]. Neftepererabotka i neftekhimiya. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie dostizheniya i peredovoy opyt. 2013, No. 10, P. 14–18 (In Russ.).

20. Kostenko A. V., Musaev A. A., Turanosov A. V. [Virtual Raw Flow Analyzer]. Neftepererabotka i neftekhimiya. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie dostizheniya i peredovoy opyt. 2006, No. 1, P. 1–13 (In Russ.).

 


Kornet Maria Evgenievna – candidate; Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology. E-mail:
marya.kornet@gmail.com.
Medvedev Alexander Vasilievich – D. Sc., Professor, Department of System Analysis and Operations Research;
Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology. E-mail: mav2745@mail.ru.
Yareshchenko Darya Igorevna – senior lecturer of the department Intelligent Control Systems of the Institute of
Space and Information Technologies; Siberian Federal University. E-mail: YareshenkoDI@yandex.ru.  


  MANAGING A GROUP OF OBJECTS AS A TASK OF SYSTEM ANALYSIS