UDK УДК 504.064.36 Doi: 10.31772/2587-6066-2018-19-4-683-690
I. V. Kovalev, D. I. Kovalev, V. V. Kolesnik, V. V. Losev, M. V. Karaseva
Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology, 31, Krasnoyarsky Rabochy Av., Krasnoyarsk, 660037, Russian Federation; Siberian Federal University, 79, Svobodny Av., Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russian Federation; Branch of “OGK-2” – Krasnoyarskaya GRES-2, 2, Pervaya Promyshlennaya Str., Zelenogorsk, 663690, Russian Federation
Nowadays one of the priorities of Energy Strategy of Russia is to organize constantly operating systems of continuous industrial monitoring of harmful emission out of coal-fired power plants into the atmosphere. The given paper considers the equipment for production and environmental monitoring of home developers and manufacturers, operated at some power plants of the Russian Federation at the lower level of monitoring of gas emission. At this level, measurements on the basis of agreed and certified methods, gathering and conversion of primary information to a standard form, routine maintenance and monitoring of the functioning of measuring systems and auxiliary equipment are carried out. Various gas analyzers and gas sections can be used to determine the composition of the combustion products in organization continuous monitoring at power plants. The selection of specific gas analytical systems is associated with certain difficulties, since they all have their advantages and disadvantages. Moreover, it is necessary to take into account a lot of different factors and parameters for the optimal selection of the equipment. The task of gas analytical systems selection is multicriterial. Difficulties in solving this problem are caused by the fact that the criteria may contradict each other (for example, high technical capabilities may complicate the operation of the system and increase its cost) and they may not be quantified. The selection of gas analytical systems for production and environmental monitoring should be as objective as possible, independent of the preferences of individual experts and specialists. The presented description of the equipment for production and environmental monitoring allows for an expert comparison of the technical characteristics of gas analyzers. Based on the methods of substantiating decisions on the selection of the structure of equipment in innovative projects, conclusions are drawn from the results of the analysis performed on 11 expertrelevant parameters.The recent expert analysis can supplement the results of the preliminary survey by the personnel of the power plant or a at power plants applied for the development of the technical specifications. It is recommended to carry out a feasibility investigation in decision making, taking into account the features of the equipment, production conditions, safety requirements and serviceability.
Keywords: monitoring, ecology, power plant, gas emission, gas analytic system, control.

1. Roslyakov P. V., Kondrat’yeva O. E. [Priority measures for the implementation of the new environmental

legislation]. New in the Russian electric power industry. 2016, No. 5, P. 6–17 (In Russ.).

2. Roslyakov P. V., Zakirov I. A., Ionkin I. L., Egorova L. E., Karankevich E. N. [The system of continuous monitoring (monitoring) and control of harmful gaseous emissions of thermal power plants in the atmosphere]. Zapiski Gornogo Instituta. 2003, Vol. 154, P. 94–96 (In Russ.).

3. Roslyakov P. V., Novozhilova L. L., Egorova L. E. [Organization of monitoring of harmful emissions from chimneys of thermal power plants based on numerical studies]. Vestnik MEI. 2008, No. 4, P. 28–39 (In Russ.).

4. Roslyakov P. V., Ionkin I. L., Zakirov I. А., Morokhovets Yu. E., Egorova L. E. [Information and Computing System for Continuous Monitoring and Emission Control of Thermal Power Plants]. Zapiski Gornogo instituta. 2004, Vol. 158, P. 126–128 (In Russ.).

5. Borisov G. M., Baltyan V. N., Skubienko S. V. [The specifics of the enterprises of electrical networks as a source of emissions of harmful substances into the atmosphere]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Severo-Kavkazskiy region. Tekhnicheskie nauki. 2003, No. 2, P. 51–53 (In Russ.).

6. Roslyakov P. V. Metody zashchity okruzhayushchey sredy [Environmental Protection Methods]. Moscow, Izdatel’skii dom MEI Publ., 2007, 336 p. (In Russ.).

7. Organizatsiya kontrolya gazovogo sostava produktov sgoraniya statsionarnykh parovykh i vodogreynykh kotlov : SO 34.02.320-2003 [Organization of control of the gas composition of products of combustion of stationary steam and hot water boilers : CO 34.02.320-2003]. Moscow, SPO ORGREHS Publ., 2003 (In Russ.).

8. Normy pogreshnosti izmereniy tekhnologicheskikh parametrov teplovykh elektrostantsiy i podstantsiy : RD 34.11.321–96 [Error limits of measurement of technological parameters of thermal power plants and substations: RD 34.11.321–96]. Moscow, VTI Publ., 1997 (In Russ.).

9. Kondrat’yeva O. E. [The main approaches to the creation of systems for monitoring the impact of thermal power plants on the environment]. Energetik. 2016, No. 12, P. 32–40 (In Russ.).

10. Korobov V. B., Tutygin A. G. [Advantages and disadvantages of the hierarchy analysis method]. Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena. 2010, No. 122, P. 108–115 (In Russ.).

11. Stepanov V. R. Osnovy teorii prinyatiya reshenii [Basics of decision theory]. Cheboksary, Klio Publ., 2004, 134 p. (In Russ.).

12. Samkov A. V., Zyat’kova A. V. [Methods to justify decisions on the choice of equipment in innovative projects]. Ventilyatsiya, otopleniye, konditsionirovaniye vozdukha, teplosnabzheniye i stroitel’naya teplofizika. 2015, No. 3, P. 68–72 (In Russ.).

13. Kopoteva А. V. [Support decision making on the modernization of production at an industrial enterprise]. Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Inzhiniring georesursov. 2014, Vol. 325, No. 6, P. 14–25 (In Russ.).

14. Gulieva P. V. Kyzy. [Theoretical and methodological problems of modernization of industrial enterprises]. Gumanitarnye, sotsial’no-ehkonomicheskie i obshhestvennye nauki. 2015, No. 6(2), P. 130–132 (In Russ.).

15. Kondrat’yeva O. E., Roslyakov P. V. [The main stages of the introduction of systems for continuous monitoring of emissions into the TPP]. Elektricheskiye stantsii. 2016, No. 9, P. 25–29 (In Russ.).

Kovalev Igor Vladimirovich – Dr. Sc., professor, Department of System analysis and Operations Research,

Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology; professor of Department of Computer Sciences,

Siberian Federal University. E-mail: kovalev.fsu@mail.ru.

Kovalev Dmitry Igorevich – engineer of Research and Development Department, Reshetnev Siberian State

University of Science and Technology. E-mail: grimm7jow@gmail.com.

Kolesnik Valery Vasilyevich – deputy head, Department of Thermal Automation and Measurement for Operation,

Krasnoyarskaya GRES-2, Branch of PJSC – OGK-2. E-mail: balans78@inbox.ru.

Losev Vasiliy Vladimirovich – Cand. Sc., Docent, Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology.

E-mail: asilos@mail.ru.

Karaseva Margarita Vladimirovna – Cand. Sc., Docent; Docent of Department of Systems Analysis and

Operations Research, Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology; Docent of Department

of Economics and Information Technology of Management, Siberian Federal University. E-mail: karasevamargarita@