UDK UDC 621.9.004.12 Doi: 10.31772/2587-6066-2018-19-4-605-612
E. A. Frolova
Saint Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation, 67, Bolshaya Morskaya Str., Saint Petersburg, 190000, Russian Federation
The method of multi-level quality assessment of interactive electronic technical manuals (IETM) for aircraft contains the main approaches, methodological and logical-mathematical tools for the implementation of multiparameter evaluation of the quality of electronic content of these manuals. The paper postulated that the goal of assessing the quality of IETM for aviation equipment is to obtain a consolidated conclusion on the degree of satisfaction of the need to create interactive electronic technical manuals in the conditions of vagueness of the initial expert data used for evaluation. It is shown that the quality assessment of interactive electronic technical manuals for the operation and repair of aviation equipment is obviously linked to non-numeric or “soft” measurements, due to the fuzzy nature of the initial qualimetric data obtained from an expert. In this version, “measurement” should be understood as a manipulation in which some strictly ordered quality gradations correlate in accordance with the IETM for the operation and repair of aviation equipment properties. In the role of quantitative measurement results, not only real numbers are considered, but also other algebraic groups that necessarily have an order relation between their elements, that is, a similarity of the inequality relation between numbers. The multi-level quality assessment of interactive electronic technical manuals for aeronautical engineering consists of the following steps: 1. Imagery of numerical vectors of values of elementary quality indicators; 2. Calculation of ranks that determine the significance of quality indicators in their compositions based on fuzzy and (or) insufficient initial data on the compositional significance of more particular indicators in the composition of more aggregated indicators: 3. Calculation of elementary indicators values and ratings of importance based on numerical vectors, for the analyzed performance of IETM on the operation and repair of aircraft, the values of the integral quality indicator, as the weighted arithmetic average of mathematical similar to a particular indicators.
Keywords: interactive electronic technical manuals, aviation technology, multi-level assessment, quality parameters.

1. Frolova E. A. [Scientifically-methodical concept of quality management of interactive electronic technical manuals on operation and repair of aviation equipment]. Voprosy radioehlektroniki. 2018, No. 10, P. 66–74 (In Russ.).

2. Michurin S. V., Semenova E. G., Frolova E. A. [Formal presentation of spatial process management quality indicators]. Conditions alternative to the development of modern economic systems management, innovation. Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference. 2016, P. 182–192.

3. Ivakin Ya. A., Semenova E. G., Morozov S. A., Smirnova M. S. [he hierarchy of indicators for assessing the quality of software and hardware complexes of data processing and storage centers]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta tekhnologii i dizajna. Seriya 1. Estestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki. 2017, No. 5, P. 65–68 (In Russ.).

4. Boem B. U. et al. Kharakteristiki kachestva programmnogo obespecheniya [Software quality characteristics]. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1981, 312 p.

5. Onishchenko V. Ya. [Classification and comparative assessment of risk factors]. Bezopasnost’ truda v promyshlennosti. 2008, No. 7(54), P. 28–37 (In Russ.).

6. Krui M., Galei D., Mark R. Osnovy riskmenedzhmenta [Fundamentals of risk management]. Moscow, Yurait Publ., 2011, 400 p.

7. Daiitbegov D. M., Kalmykov O. V., Cherepanov A. I. Programmnoe obespechenie statisticheskoi obrabotki dannykh [Software for statistical data processing]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 1984, 211 p.

8. Semenova E. G., Frolova E. A. Strukturirovanie trebovaniy k pokazatelyam funkcionirovaniya bortovyh kompleksov [Structuring requirements for performance indicators of airborne systems]. GUAP, 2004, VINITI, 12.02.2004 244-V2004. 9 p.

9. Semenova E. G., Smirnova M. S., Tushavi V. A. Decision making support system in multi-objective issues of quality management in the field of information technology. Research Journal of Applied Sciences. 2014, Vol. 9, Iss. 12, P. 1078–1081.

10. Khovanov N. V. Metod randomizirovannykh svodnykh pokazatelei [The method of randomized summary indicators]. St. Petersburg, SPbGU Publ., 1999, 86 p.

11. Khovanov N. V., Mikhailov M. V., Khovanov N. V. Otsenka slozhnykh finansovo-ekonomicheskikh ob’’ektov s ispol’zovaniem sistemy podderzhki prinyatiya reshenii ASPID-3W [Evaluation of complex financial and economic objects using the ASPID-3W decision support system]. St. Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta Publ., 2004, 63 p.

12. Popovich, V. V., Ivakin, Y. A., Shaida, S. S. Theory of search for moving objects. Oceans Conference Record (IEEE). 2002, No. 3, P. 1319–1329.

13. Bromfield M. A., Walton T., Wright D., Rusby M. Evaluation of cots solutions to support flight operations quality assurance in business/corporate aviation. Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. 2018, No. AIAA 2018-3197, 13 p.

14. Liao J., Zang Y., Zhou Z., Luo X. Quality evaluation method and optimization of operating parameters in crop aerial spraying technology. Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao / Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. 2015, No. 31, P. 38–46.

15. Michurin S. V., Michurin S. V., Smirnova M. S. [The structure of the system of requirements for a qualimetric assessment of situational spatial process management]. Voprosy radioehlektroniki. 2016, No. 6, P. 33–35 (In Russ.).

Frolova Elena Alexandrovna – Cand. Sc., Docent, Department of Innovatics and Integrated Quality Systems,

Saint-Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation. E-mail: frolovaelena@mail.ru.